09-23-2011 at 01:46 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#16
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Tooth Fairy 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Aug 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,068
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				118 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				543 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		 appearntly the C-H question the one with the negative nitrogen inducing seperation of charge is the false one. I asked Dr. Yang after the midterm was over. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				 
McMaster University, Honours B.Sc. in Biology '13, Minor in Psychology 
 
University of British Columbia, DMD '17, Doctor of Dental Medicine
			 
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 01:49 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#17
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Mr.Spock is not dazzled. 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Jul 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,630
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				86 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				611 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  L'Étoile
					 
				 
				appearntly the C-H question the one with the negative nitrogen inducing seperation of charge is the false one. I asked Dr. Yang after the midterm was over. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 But it makes sense... N induces a partial + in C, so it pulls the electron from H and its own closer, making H less stable and more attractive to an O/other half of an H bond...
 
This sucks because I knew C could Hbond (SPONC!), but the others looked better...
 
Well that is one wrong for me... and 1% of my final grade if I get scheme A...  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
						  
				
				Last edited by britb : 09-23-2011 at 01:52 PM.
				
				
			
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 01:52 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#18
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Tooth Fairy 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Aug 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,068
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				118 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				543 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		 N is never negative .....................  ............... i know tricky 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				 
McMaster University, Honours B.Sc. in Biology '13, Minor in Psychology 
 
University of British Columbia, DMD '17, Doctor of Dental Medicine
			 
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 01:57 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#19
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Mr.Spock is not dazzled. 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Jul 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,630
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				86 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				611 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  L'Étoile
					 
				 
				N is never negative .....................  ............... i know tricky 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 :O That IS tricky, because it has higher EN than C anyway, you'd think it would be the - side of the molecule, at least when its sitting next to a carbon...
 
Yeah I still don't get it... did anyone see it in the text? I dont think I did...  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 01:58 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#20
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Elite Member 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Nov 2008 
				
		
			Posts: 981
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				87 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				307 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  L'Étoile
					 
				 
				appearntly the C-H question the one with the negative nitrogen inducing seperation of charge is the false one. I asked Dr. Yang after the midterm was over. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 That question was so crazy though. Mad ambiguity about the water answer (does it mean [H20] or [solute]?), and also the fact we could not have known the answer.... How do we know that that was for sure false. After all the NH2- anion can exist so why can't a deprotonated amine exist?Sure its likely to be some funky chemistry but so is the idea of C-H acting as a hydrogen bond donor (I have never heard this before today).  
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Alasdair Rathbone 
H. B.Sc. Kin. 
Class of 2017 Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry MD Program
			 
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:06 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#21
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Mr.Spock is not dazzled. 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Jul 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,630
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				86 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				611 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  arathbon
					 
				 
				That question was so crazy though. Mad ambiguity about the water answer (does it mean [H20] or [solute]?), and also the fact we could not have known the answer.... How do we know that that was for sure false. After all the NH2- anion can exist so why can't a deprotonated amine exist?Sure its likely to be some funky chemistry but so is the idea of C-H acting as a hydrogen bond donor (I have never heard this before today). 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 From what I got, hydrogen bond donors give up H, and hydrogen bond acceptors have the lps. It was very confusing, because it pretty much the opposite of orgo  (electrons are usually donated, not Hs).
 
:/  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:15 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#22
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Elite Member 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Nov 2008 
				
		
			Posts: 981
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				87 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				307 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  britb
					 
				 
				From what I got, hydrogen bond donors give up H, and hydrogen bond acceptors have the lps. It was very confusing, because it pretty much the opposite of orgo  (electrons are usually donated, not Hs). 
 
:/ 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 It wasn't the donorship that got me (it follows the same terminology as Bronsted-Lowry, as oppose to Lewis), but C-H participating in hydrogen bonding. The textbook simply states that the donor group is weakly acidic and suggests O-H, N-H or sometimes S-H. It doesn't mention C-H, and I don't recall ever seeing a reference to C-H acting in such a manner before.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Alasdair Rathbone 
H. B.Sc. Kin. 
Class of 2017 Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry MD Program
			 
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:18 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#23
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Mr.Spock is not dazzled. 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Jul 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,630
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				86 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				611 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  arathbon
					 
				 
				It wasn't the donorship that got me (it follows the same terminology as Bronsted-Lowry, as oppose to Lewis), but C-H participating in hydrogen bonding. The textbook simply states that the donor group is weakly acidic and suggests O-H, N-H or sometimes S-H. It doesn't mention C-H, and I don't recall ever seeing a reference to C-H acting in such a manner before. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Yes. Add to it this business about N never being negative...
 
I can't wait to see the distribution...  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
						  
				
				Last edited by britb : 09-23-2011 at 02:29 PM.
				
				
			
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:34 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#24
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Senior Member 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Jul 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 131
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				26 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				24 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  arathbon
					 
				 
				That question was so crazy though. Mad ambiguity about the water answer (does it mean [H20] or [solute]?), and also the fact we could not have known the answer.... How do we know that that was for sure false. After all the NH2- anion can exist so why can't a deprotonated amine exist?Sure its likely to be some funky chemistry but so is the idea of C-H acting as a hydrogen bond donor (I have never heard this before today). 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 The choice with the water concentration was worded weird. I don't know for sure if it was meant to mean solute concentration, or water concentration. But if it was just water concentration then that is just volume.... I hope it meant solute concentration.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:42 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#25
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Mr.Spock is not dazzled. 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Jul 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,630
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				86 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				611 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  R633
					 
				 
				The choice with the water concentration was worded weird. I don't know for sure if it was meant to mean solute concentration, or water concentration. But if it was just water concentration then that is just volume.... I hope it meant solute concentration. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Do you mean the part with osmosis? That's the actual definition of it... though its the same as diffusion basically (solute moving from high to low is the same as water moving high to low, because if you have more solute, [H2O] will be less...)
 
If you mean the one with ice... well everyone hated that, lol.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:47 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#26
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Elite Member 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Nov 2008 
				
		
			Posts: 981
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				87 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				307 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  britb
					 
				 
				Do you mean the part with osmosis? That's the actual definition of it... though its the same as diffusion basically (solute moving from high to low is the same as water moving high to low, because if you have more solute, [H2O] will be less...) 
 
If you mean the one with ice... well everyone hated that, lol. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 No we mean in this case the osmosis one. It wasn't clear which concentration the question was referring to (water vs. solute). Water moves from low to high solute concentration or high to low water concentration. Some textbooks refer to it the first way (I'm pretty sure Biological Sciences does), but on checking our textbook refers to it in terms of water concentration. It's fair, but there's an ambiguity in the question that more tests your ability to remember which was this textbook referred to it than your actual understanding of osmosis.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Alasdair Rathbone 
H. B.Sc. Kin. 
Class of 2017 Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry MD Program
			 
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:50 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#27
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Member 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Jun 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 40
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				9 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				Liked 2 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		 About the C-H H-bond question, there was a question in the end of the chapter questions that mentions it. If you check the answers, it explains it. 
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
 
 arathbon
					says thanks to bumbum for this post.
				
 
   
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:54 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#28
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Tooth Fairy 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Aug 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,068
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				118 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				543 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		 He is asian, his language will never be better than its now. "None of the rest" ... huh?  
 
to be honest, no matter how many times we will complain about how profs write midterms in their own language, McMaster won't take action! 
 
I had Ullal for sensory, there was a multiple choice question that I got wrong because of a missing comma! the missing comma changed the meaning that I understood!!! he meant the other meaning with the comma but since there was no comma I thought that he meant something else! its honestly crazy! 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				 
McMaster University, Honours B.Sc. in Biology '13, Minor in Psychology 
 
University of British Columbia, DMD '17, Doctor of Dental Medicine
			 
		
		
		
		
		
						  
				
				Last edited by L'Étoile : 09-23-2011 at 03:02 PM.
				
				
			
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 02:55 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#29
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Elite Member 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Nov 2008 
				
		
			Posts: 981
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				87 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				307 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  bumbum
					 
				 
				About the C-H H-bond question, there was a question in the end of the chapter questions that mentions it. If you check the answers, it explains it. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 That's actually pretty annoying. Looks like I actually have to do all the questions in case other random answers are hidden in there.  
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Alasdair Rathbone 
H. B.Sc. Kin. 
Class of 2017 Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry MD Program
			 
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
	
	
		
	
		
	
				
			
			 
			09-23-2011 at 03:04 PM
			
						
		 | 
		
			 
			
			#30
			
 | 
	
 
	| 
			
			
 
 Mr.Spock is not dazzled. 
			
		
	
		
				
				
				
				Join Date: Jul 2009 
				
		
			Posts: 1,630
		 
 
	
Thanked: 
		
			
				86 Times
			
		
	 
 
Liked: 
		
			
				611 Times
			
		
	  
				
								
		
			 
 
 
  
	 | 
	
	
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
	
		
			
				
					Originally Posted by  bumbum
					 
				 
				About the C-H H-bond question, there was a question in the end of the chapter questions that mentions it. If you check the answers, it explains it. 
			
		 | 
	 
	 
 Wow, the one time in my entire student career that textbook questions are relevant. :| Next time, I guess. Thank you!  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
  
	 | 
 
 
	 
	
		 	
	 
 
  
	
		
	| Thread Tools | 
	Search this Thread | 
 
	| 
	
	
	
	
	
	 | 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	 | 
	
 
 
	
		 
	
		 
		Posting Rules
	 | 
 
	
		
		You may not post new threads 
		You may not post replies 
		You may not post attachments 
		You may not edit your posts 
		 
		
		
		
		
		HTML code is Off 
		
	  | 
 
   
	 | 
	
		
	 | 
 
 
		 	
	 
 
 
 McMaster University News and Information, Student-run Community, with topics ranging from Student Life, Advice, News, Events, and General Help.
 
Notice: The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the student(s) who authored the content. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by McMaster University or the MSU (McMaster Students Union). Being a student-run community, all articles and discussion posts on MacInsiders are unofficial and it is therefore always recommended that you visit the official McMaster website for the most accurate up-to-date information. 
 
 |     |