MacInsiders Logo

Similar Threads
Review Review Starter Category Comments Last Post
Enviro Sci 2Q03 - Any advice? nmerwin Academics 1 06-11-2012 11:55 PM
ENVIRO SCI 2Q03 textbook mlangille Academics 0 02-03-2011 10:05 PM

Earth Sci. / Enviro. Sci. 2Q03

 
Earth Sci. / Enviro. Sci. 2Q03
Introduction to Environmental Geochemistry
Published by Farhaan
05-02-2014
Published by
Farhaan's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 23

Earth Sci. / Enviro. Sci. 2Q03

Unlike many environmental sciences courses, the content of EARTH SCI 2Q03 is mostly calculation-based. CHEM 1A03 (basic chemical principles & balancing redox reactions) is a prerequisite for the course but I found that the test and exam placed a larger emphasis on acid/base & buffer chemistry, which is covered more fully in CHEM 1AA3. The course was taught be Dr. Warren and the textbook used was "Environmental Geochemistry" by G. Nelson Eby.

The mark breakdown was: 5% for a short introductory quiz (easy marks), 30% for two formal labs (average for the first one was 65% but the second lab was very identical to the first and you could improve your second lab report based on feedback from your first one), 30% for a midterm and 35% for the final exam. In addition, Dr. Warren gave us a bonus in-class pop quiz that could have increased our midterm grade by 7% and weighted our two formal labs, midterm exam and final exam so that the better of the two labs / exams would carry more weight.

The course started off with reviewing basic chemical / mathematical principles such as unit conversions (chapter 1 of Eby). The course then proceeds to review La Chatelier's Principles (chapter 2 of Eby; and, again, CHEM 1A03 review) and introduces Henry's Law, which is a simple mathematical relationship that relates the concentration of a dissolved substance at a certain temperature to the pressure of a gas in the atmosphere. New content (and the final content for the midterm) really starts at chapter 3 of Eby and involves applying acid-base chemistry to water bodies. Many of the questions in this chapter are based on the Henderson-Hasselbach equation (used when talking about buffers; covered in CHEM 1AA3) and relate to the fact that atmospheric carbon dioxide sets up a bicarbonate buffer with water bodies (again, covered in CHEM 1AA3). Wikipedia has a pretty good summary of these concepts here. For the 2013/14 midterm exam ~40% of the class got an A-grade and 35% got a B or C grade.

Post-midterm content involved balancing redox reactions (chapter 4 of Eby, CHEM 1A03 review) and used acid mine drainage as a case study. In the redox section of the course, there was a large emphasis on how chemical reactions taking place in an environmental systems are intricately connected and how changes in temperature and pH can have large impacts on aqueous geochemistry. The last bits of the course also touched up on how waste-waters can be re-mediated using chemicals and bacteria and calculating how much of each you would need to clean waste-water with certain properties. These last two topics were the most interesting for me.

I feel like quite a few envir. sci. majors in the course were intimidated because they didn't feel comfortable with chemistry, but if you complete the practice questions as they are assigned (read: not two days before the exam) you should be fine.

Last few notes:
- answers to some practice questions weren't posted so I would highly recommend forming a Facebook group for the course
- the content that was covered in lectures wasn't exactly the same content that was covered on the exams so I would recommend going over all of the calculation-based problems when studying
- Dr. Warren didn't ask any questions about the non-chemistry side of geochemistry on exams (2013/2014) even though it was covered in lecture (i.e. why is studying acid mine drainage important?)
- Dr. Warren occasionally called people out in lecture for being on their phones / asking obvious questions, doesn't post lecture slides and often repeated what was in the textbook, but don't let that stop you from going to class as much of the bio-remediation material isn't in the textbook
- completing the 2013/2014 labs involved quite a bit of research from sources other than the textbook / lecture; I believe we earned marks for citing primary literature when appropriate

Good luck!
Deleted Post
Edit/Delete Message
Click here to add your own review for Earth Sci. / Enviro. Sci. 2Q03!

Old 07-01-2014 at 09:27 PM   #2
Shananaghens
Member
Posts: 33

Thanked: 2 Times
Liked: 3 Times
I loved this class. I had it with Warren, and there may be some who warn you against taking this with her, but honestly all she wants is someone to speak up and answer her questions, and you're on her good list. The beginning of the course is very easy and straight forward, and I think the biggest problem people have is with all the chemical equations to remember but honestly, she tells you straight up to memorize them for the exam, where one of the questions was "write out the full steps for the entire chemical process" and it really isn't that hard to remember. I would say it's very important to go to class, as she didn't post notes, but I took it 3 years ago and she may use Avenue now!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014 at 09:39 AM   #3
jvux
Member
Posts: 46

Thanked: 1 Time
Liked: 1 Time
- Read/skim the textbook before going to lecture. Sometimes there is not enough time to copy down the material, and she does not post the slides after class.
- The midterm and exam wasn't too difficult. The midterm was similar to the questions she assigned. The exam had new questions (you had to really know the material).
- Like Farhaan said, the midterm average was: 30% got 10+, 30% got an average grade (B's, C's), and 30% failed. A lot of people underestimated this course and did poorly. Be sure to keep up with the course because she picks on people during lecture
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2014 at 09:57 PM   #4
Silver
Elite Member
Posts: 1,511

Thanked: 193 Times
Liked: 392 Times
lucky you guys. this class with bernier was terrible. low lab avgs (in 50s) and exam marking was dubious.
  Reply With Quote



Review Tools Search this Review
Search this Review:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new reviews
You may not post comments
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



McMaster University News and Information, Student-run Community, with topics ranging from Student Life, Advice, News, Events, and General Help.
Notice: The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the student(s) who authored the content. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by McMaster University or the MSU (McMaster Students Union). Being a student-run community, all articles and discussion posts on MacInsiders are unofficial and it is therefore always recommended that you visit the official McMaster website for the most accurate up-to-date information.

Copyright © MacInsiders.com All Rights Reserved. No content can be re-used or re-published without permission. MacInsiders is a service of Fullerton Media Inc. | Created by Chad
Originally Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright © 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Terms